And yet, there is really no scientific reason proving that radiometric dating is correct, and a number of evidences showing that it doesn't work. We'll find that faith in materialism, and rejection of any supernatural activity, is the foundation stone of radiometric analysis, even before any measurements are made.
Most people, even the experts in the field, forget the assumptions on which radiometric dating is based.
But we won't discuss the C-14 method in this article.C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.How does ideas concepts get from mind to math/formulas?What is the “dirty work” that goes on behind the scenes?So when the two contradict – as they do with the age of the universe and the earth – many abandon the faith and reject the Genesis account because current science tells them that the universe and the earth is billions of years old, and disregard the biblical account – which indicates an age of about 6,000 years.
The evidence many find persuasive: radiometric dating.But is radiometric dating really the objective hard science many believe it to be?By “objective, hard science” I mean science that is measurable, repeatable, predictable, consistent and accurate.The majority of the interesting stuff in the world involves stuff much more fancy.There’s already a lot of mathematical structures out there (calculus and topology and all kinds of stuff) so, when you can, you find one that’s familiar and see if it fits. Here’s how it starts: you tinker about with something until you notice a pattern. New symbols come as part of a package that includes rules.Carbon has unique properties that are essential for life on Earth.